BDS is a non-violent campaign that supports proven methods of conscientious objection to encourage Israel to respect international law. In the past, Canadians have supported BDS aimed at several countries. Canadian churches, NGOs, universities and labor organizations were significant participants in BDS movements against South African apartheid. Such legitimate scrutiny and action by citizens can encourage countries that violate human rights to change their policies and no country should be made immune to these.

At its core, the vote on the anti-BDS motion would go against the spirit of Freedom of Speech, a right enshrined in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Democratic governments do not ordinarily attempt to dictate the political views of their citizens. NCCAR Chair, Gabriel Fahel, reminds us that “freedom of speech and conscientious objections to buying products from countries that contravene international law are core values of a free and democratic society.”

NCCAR believes that Canadians’ free speech should be protected and put first when considering a position for or against BDS.

The National Council on Canada Arab Relations (NCCAR) is a non-profit organization whose mission is to build knowledge and ties between Canadians and the people of the Arab world in order to develop stronger relations and cooperation between them as well as raise an appreciation of their common values. NCCAR’s goal is to advance education in Canada by a)  providing seminars, conferences and workshops and b) providing leadership training in relation to the social, economic, political and cultural history and current issues of the Arab world and Middle East. NCCAR is a member-driven organization supported by Canadians of diverse backgrounds across Canada.

For further information on the National Council on Canada Arab Relations (NCCAR) please visit our website at www.nccar.ca or write to us at 1 Rideau Street, Suite 700, Ottawa, ON, K1N 8S7.

Contact: nccar@nccar.ca |  NCCAR Office: 613-238-3795

Twitter: @NCCARCanada | Facebook: NCCAR | www.nccar.ca

Communiqué Le CNRCA exhorte à considérer en priorité la liberté d’expression des Canadiens durant les débats sur le BDS A la lumière d’une motion aujourd’hui au Parlement appelant le gouvernement canadien à “condamner toute tentative d’organisations canadiennes, groupes ou individus visant à promouvoir le mouvement BDS [Boycott, Désinvestissement et Sanctions]” en lien avec Israël, le Conseil national des relations canado-arabes (CNRCA) invite les Canadiens à se référer à l’histoire louable que leur pays entretient avec les mouvements BDS et à la relation de longue durée entre ces mouvements et les principes canadiens démocratiques. 

Le BDS est une campagne non-violente soutenant des méthodes éprouvées d’objection de conscience afin d’encourage Israël à respecter les normes internationales. Précédemment, les Canadiens ont encouragés les mouvements de BDS visant de nombreux pays. Les Églises, ONGs, universités et unions canadiennes ont été des acteurs importants des mouvements BDS contre l’apartheid sud africain. Aucun pays ne devrait être à l’abris de tels examens publics légitimes et de telles actions pouvant encourager les États contrevenant aux droits humains à changer leurs politiques.

Dans ces fondements, le vote sur la motion anti-BDS irait contre l’esprit de liberté d’expression, un droit inscrit dans la Charte des droits et libertés du Canada. Les gouvernements démocratiques ne tentent pas communément de dicter des visions politiques à leurs citoyens. Le Président du CNRCA, Gabriel Fahel nous rappelle que “la liberté d’expression et d’objection de conscience d’acheter des produits provenant de certains pays contrevenant aux normes internationales sont des valeurs fondamentales dans une société libre et démocratique”.

Le CNRCA soutient que le droit à la liberté d’expression des Canadiens inscrit dans la charte doit être protégé et considéré en priorité dans les débats en faveur ou contre le BDS.

Le Conseil national des relations canado-arabes (CNRCA) est un organisme à but non lucratif dont la mission est de tisser des liens entre les Canadiens et les peuples du monde arabe pour créer des relations et une collaboration plus étroites entre eux, et pour mieux apprécier leurs valeurs communes. L’objectif du CNRCA est de promouvoir l’éducation au Canada en a) fournissant des séminaires, conférences et ateliers ainsi qu’en b) offrant des formations en lien avec les aspects sociaux, économiques, politiques et culturels du monde arabe et du Moyen Orient. Le CNRCA est un organisme dirigé par ses membres et appuyé par des Canadiens de divers horizons dans l’ensemble du Canada.

Pour plus de renseignements sur le Conseil national des relations canado-arabes, veuillez visitez notre site Web à l’adresse www.nccar.ca ou écrivez-nous au 1 Rue Rideau, Suite 700, Ottawa, ON, K1N 8S7.

Contact: nccar@nccar.ca  |  NCCAR Office: 613-238-3795

Twitter: @NCCARCanada | Facebook: NCCAR | www.nccar.ca

The post Media Release: NCCAR Urges Putting Canadians’ Right to Free Speech First When Considering BDS Position appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

Embassy is Canada’s only newspaper that exclusively covers the country’s international portfolios of diplomacy, defence, immigration, trade, and development. Since its launch as a weekly and online newspaper in 2004, it has earned a reputation as the meeting place for some of Canada’s top foreign affairs experts, and a regular source of breaking international issue news and insider analysis.

The article is reprinted below with permission from Embassy where it originally appeared in the May 26th, 2015 issue . The original article can be found by clicking here. Subscription is required to access certain articles

Public Safety Minister Stephen Blaney recently declared that Canada will show “zero tolerance” towards the so-called BDS movement, which encourages boycotting Israel. In correspondence with Neil Macdonald of the CBC, Public Safety spokesperson Josée Sirois implied that the minister feels that Canadians who endorse the BDS movement are guilty of “hate crimes.”

Of course, few Canadians will disagree that hate crimes should be punished by law. Expressing hatred toward any group of people based on religion, nationality, gender or ethnicity is totally unacceptable.

But criticizing behaviours of political actors, including our own government or the governments of other countries, is a totally different matter. Already over 90 Canadian civil society organizations, from the BC Civil Liberties Association to the Canadian Labour Congress to Amnesty International to Independent Jewish Voices, have raised strong objections to what appear to be threats to our Charter-protected right of freedom of speech.

The BDS movement was launched in 2005 by 170 Palestinian civil society organizations, representing Palestinian refugees, Palestinians under occupation and Palestinian citizens of Israel. It was conceived of as a peaceful, non-violent way to bring international pressure on Israel. It was also endorsed by all the major Christian churches in Palestine in addition to Muslim religious leaders.

BDS stands for a program of boycotting Israeli products, financial disinvestment from Israeli companies, and government sanctions against the state of Israel until it meets certain conditions.

But what is it, exactly, that the BDS movement is asking for? What is it asking Israel to do?

The BDS movement has three simple, democratic demands, all of which can be met by the Israeli government. Ironically, as it turns out, all three of the BDS demands are also completely consistent with official policy of the Canadian government.

The first BDS demand is “ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands.”

This is completely consistent with Canada’s existing policy as stated on the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development website:

“Canada does not recognize permanent Israeli control over territories occupied in 1967 (the Golan Heights, the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip)…As referred to in UN Security Council Resolutions 446 and 465, Israeli settlements in the occupied territories are a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.”

The second BDS demand is “recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality.”

The promotion of equality and democracy around the world is one of Canada’s fundamental principles – from China, to Iran to Sri Lanka. See, for example, this from the DFATD website:

”Canada has been a consistently strong voice for the protection of human rights and the advancement of democratic values, from our central role in the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1947/1948 to our work at the United Nations today.”

The BDS demand for equality for non-Jews living inside Israel is completely consistent with our promotion of democracy in other countries.

The third BDS demand is “respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN resolution 194.”

This too, is already in our existing policy:

“Canada believes that a just solution to the Palestinian refugee issue is central to a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as called for in United Nations General Assembly resolution 194 (1948) and United Nations Security Council resolution 242…This solution should respect the rights of the refugees, in accordance with international law.”

While these reasonable and democratic policy demands have been the official Canadian position for the last two decades, we have been spectacularly unsuccessful in persuading Israel to adopt them.

An international campaign of boycott, divestment and sanctions is now developing to bring pressure on Israel. What would be the rationale for criminalizing it?

Peter Larson is the chair of National Education Committee on Israel/Palestine, a committee of the National Council on Canada Arab Relations.

editor@embassynews.ca

PMO Photo: Jason Ransom

Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his wife Laureen, with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara during Mr. Harper’s first official visit to Israel in January 2014.

The post Israel boycott demands consistent with official Canadian policy – Published in Embassy Magazine appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

The events were organized by the National Education Committee on Israel/Palestine (NECIP), a subcommittee of NCCAR.

At the public lectures in Montreal and Ottawa, Cook presented a very powerful and insightful presentation to diverse audiences on the challenges facing Israeli’s Arab population as a consequence of Israel defining itself as a “Jewish State”. The talks were followed by a Q&A period of challenging questions.

During his visit, Cook had a total of 9 meetings, and met or talked to over 500 Canadians. NECIP has produced a summary report outlining the summary of Cook’s activities and the 10 key points from the talk. Whether you attended or missed the event, the document provides an excellent break down of the important points drawn from Cook’s talk.

SUMMARY REPORT: You can access the document by clicking here.

In addition, you can watch Jonathan Cook’s presentation in Ottawa at the video links below:

Click here for part 1 of the video
Click here for part 2 f the video

NECIP  would like to thank everyone for their generous donations as well as the many organizations that endorsed this event: Association of Palestinian Arab Canadians, Independent Jewish Voices, Palestinian Canadian Congress. Canadian Unitarians for Social Justice, Canadian Friends of Sabeel, United Network for a Just Peace in Palestine and Israel, NOWAR/PAIX, Group of 78, and Les Artistes pour la Paix.

Click on the links below to see pictures from the events in Montreal & Ottawa

March 1st: Pictures from Montreal

March 3rd: Pictures from Ottawa

The post Recap of the Jonathan Cook events in Montreal and Ottawa (pictures, video, and report) appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

NCCAR team lunch with Jonathan Cook

Visiting Montreal tourist sites

Visiting Montreal tourist sites

Volunteers at the public event

Guests mingling with Cook prior to the lecture

Fouad Sahyoun introducing Jonathan Cook

Jonathan Cook

The post Pictures from the Jonathan Cook event in Montreal appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

Left to right: Minister John Marsh, Peter Larson, Jonathan Cook, Anita MacLean, David Parnas

Peter Larson- Master of Ceremony

Minister John Marsh – Opening Remarks

Jonathan Cook

Mingling with Jonathan Cook prior to the lecture

Q&A session

David Parnas thanking Jonathan Cook for his presentation 

The post Pictures from the Jonathan Cook event in Ottawa appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

Click here to read a very insightful report of their observations. Feel free to share with others.

For more information about the next upcoming tour please e-mail: comeandsee@nccar.ca

The post Report: Observations from NCCAR “Come and See Tour” to Israel/Palestine, November 2013 appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

Jonathan Cook’s Biography

Jonathan Cook is an award-winning British/Israeli journalist based in Nazareth, Israel, since 2001.

Jonathan’s reports and commentaries have appeared in the Guardian, the Observer, the Times and the New Statesman (London); The International Herald Tribune and Le Monde diplomatique (Paris); Al-Ahram Weekly (Cairo); The National (Abu Dhabi); The Daily Star (Beirut); The Middle East Report and Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (Washington); and The Irish Times (Dublin). He has contributed to many online sites, such as CounterPunch, Israeli Occupation Archive, Al-Jazeera.com and Electronic Intifada.

In 2011 Jonathan was awarded the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. The judges’ citation reads: “Jonathan Cook’s work on Palestine and Israel, especially his de-coding of official propaganda and his outstanding analysis of events often obfuscated in the mainstream, has made him one of the reliable truth-tellers in the Middle East.”

He has been a senior consultant and lead writer on two major reports by the International Crisis Group, a leading think-tank based in Washington and Brussels dealing with conflict resolution., and has also contributed chapters and essays to several edited volumes on Israel-Palestine.

Why Nazareth?

Jonathan is the only foreign correspondent to be based in Nazareth, the capital of the Palestinian minority in Israel. He explains the significance of his choice of location:

“Most reporters covering the conflict live in Jerusalem or Tel Aviv, with a handful of specialists based in the West Bank city of Ramallah. The range of stories readily available to reporters in these locations reinforces the assumption among editors back home that the conflict can only be understood in terms of the events that followed the West Bank and Gaza’s occupation in 1967.

“Many topics central to the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians, including the plight of the refugees and the continuing dispossession of Palestinians living as Israeli citizens, do not register on most reporters’ radars.

“From Nazareth, the capital of the Palestinian minority in Israel, things look very different. There are striking, and disturbing, similarities between the experiences of Palestinians inside Israel and those inside the West Bank and Gaza. All have faced Zionism’s appetite for territory and domination, as well as repeated attempts at ethnic cleansing. These unifying themes suggest that the conflict is less about the specific circumstances thrown up by the 1967 war and more about the central tenets of Zionism as expressed in the war of 1948 that founded Israel and the war of 1967 that breathed new life into its settler colonial agenda.”

Experience and qualifications

Jonathan graduated from Southampton University in 1987 with a degree in philosophy and politics, and then earned a postgraduate diploma in journalism from Cardiff University in 1989. He gained a Masters degree in Middle Eastern studies, with distinction, from the School of Oriental and African Studies, London University, in 2000.

He worked on regional newspapers before becoming a staff journalist at the Guardian in 1994. He later joined the Observer newspaper. He moved to Nazareth to become a freelance reporter in September 2001.

The post Jonathan Cook’s Biography appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

1. Is the Steven J. Harper Hula Valley Bird Sanctuary, just an environmental project? Mr. Harper was recently honoured by the Jewish National Fund of Canada which announced that the Hula Valley Bird Sanctuary would carry his name.

But the “Hula Valley Bird Sanctuary” hides a dark past. In 1948 there were several small Palestinian villages eking out a poor living in the malaria infested marshy valley by fishing and weaving papyrus mats.

According to Israeli historian Benny Morris, the Hula Valley was cleared of its Bedouin inhabitants in 1948 (before the declaration of Israeli independence) in “Operation Broom” led by Israeli General Yigal Allon. In Morris’ account, the soldiers were ordered to attack villages in the area, and that “their inhabitants expelled and the[ir] houses blown up.” An eyewitness quoted by Morris described the scene:

“House after house was bombed and torched, then matters proceeded towards the Jordan. All was bombed, the tents and huts were burned. All day there were explosions, and smoke and fire were visible.”

General Allon described the effect of psychological warfare on the Palestinian Arabs:

“The confidence of thousands of [Palestinian] Arabs of the Hula [Valley] was shaken . . . We had ONLY five days left . . . until 15 May [1948]. We regarded it as imperative to CLEANSE [of Palestinian Arabs] the interior of the Galilee and create JEWISH territorial continuity in the whole of the Upper Galilee.”

The confiscated land was allocated for the development of kibbutzim, but the reclamation was a failure and most of the valley has subsequently returned to its natural state. The Palestinian villagers have never been allowed to return to their land. They were permanently displaced without compensation.

It is on and around these ruins that The Stephen J. Harper Hula Valley Bird Sanctuary Visitor and Education Centre will be built.

For more information, please refer to: The Birth of the Palestinian refugee problem, 1947–1948, Benny Morris, 1989

2. Should Canada recognize Israel as a “Jewish State”? Mr. Harper has stated that Canada recognizes Israel’s right to exist “as a Jewish State”, repeating a demand that Israeli PM Netanyahu first formulated in 2009 as a “condition” for negotiations with the PLO. To superficial observers, the notion that Israel be recognized “as a Jewish state”, seems benign – both a reflection of the reality that 75% of the Israeli population is Jewish, and a reflection of the desire to ensure that the Jewish people is able to protect itself against any repetition of the horrendous occurrences of the Holocaust.

On closer examination however, the demand seems to have another purpose – to make it impossible for the PLO to agree to any peace deal. It is certainly not a requirement for any peace agreement.  Israel signed peace agreements with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994. In both accords, the parties recognized the State of Israel. But there was no mention of recognizing Israel “as a Jewish state”.

But why would it be so difficult for the PLO to agree to recognize Israel “as a Jewish state?”

Three main reasons:

1. It is not clear what this would mean in law. Based on Israel’s current practice, it certainly means that Jewish Israelis will get some rights that non-Jewish Israelis won’t get. But which privileges?  How far would it go? Would it mean the end of the Arab school system inside Israel? Would it mean the end of the right to vote for non-Jewish citizens? Would it mean even more aggressive programs of “Judaization” like those currently being applied in the Galilee and in the Negev. Would it go so far as to support more “ethnic cleansing”? There are already powerful voices in Mr. Netanyahu’s coalition who openly call for the expulsion of the Palestinians who still live in Israel.
2. Recognizing Israel “as a Jewish state” would be comparable to asking Quebecers to recognize Canada as an “English and Protestant” State, or for the US to declare that it is a “white” state. In Canada, this would be seen as a huge step backward – away from the common conception of “equality of all citizens” in any state. This is now the Canadian norm, and indeed the international norm. If Israel were to be recognized “as a Jewish state”, this would open the door to allowing many kinds of discrimination against its non Jewish citizens.
3. The only way Israel can be guaranteed to be a “Jewish state” is to guarantee a “Jewish majority” – which means refusing forever the right of return to the Palestinian refugees. There are approximately 5 million Palestinian refugees. They are the families of those who were expelled from Israel in 1948 and whose lands and goods were confiscated without compensation by Israel only a few years after Jewish art and other valuables were confiscated by the Nazis in Europe. They await implementation of several UN resolutions (which Canada has supported) affirming their right to return to their homes and farms. Most of them live in refugee camps in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Gaza and the West Bank. Giving up this right is another “impossible” condition for the PLO.

This also poses a dilemma for Canada. In 1949, Canada voted in favour of a UN resolution calling on Israel to readmit the refugees. In fact, admission of Israel as a member to the UN was conditional on Israel’s acceptance of the right of the refugees to return. Canada voted in favour of this resolution as well. But if Canada recognizes Israel “as a Jewish state”, this means that Canada no longer supports the rights of those refugees to return.

For more information on the consequences of “Israel as a Jewish state”, you might want to contact Jonathon Cook, a journalist living in Nazareth. http://www.jonathan-cook.net/

3. Should Canadians be concerned about the human rights of the Negev Bedouin? For the last several months tensions have been mounting in Israel over plans to evict the Bedouins who live in the Negev desert, which constitutes the southern half of Israel.  Bedouins have been living here for centuries, certainly long before the creation of the State of Israel. (Many of them have documents from Ottoman times showing that they have possession of land.) Israel has been promoting a plan to “remove” the Bedouin to a few concentrated areas. The stated objective is to more easily provide services (education, water, sewage etc.) in a few cities, rather than spread out across the desert. In this it is reminiscent of the closing of Newfoundland’s outports in the ‘1970s, except it applies only to Bedouins, not to Jews living in the area.

However, the Bedouins have been actively resisting. Demonstrations were held all across Israel on November 30th. The Bedouin argue that far from seeking to provide better services, the Government of Israel is trying to “ethnically cleanse” the Negev, by driving out the Bedouin and at the same time using subsidies including housing and water, to attract Jews to settle in the area.

Over a hundred high profile Canadian artists and authors, including Margaret Atwood and John Ralston Saul signed a petition last July urging the Israeli government to drop its plan. https://www.cjpme.org/DisplayHTMLDocument.aspx?DO=795&ICID=3&RecID=1124&SaveMode=0

Several European countries, including the United Kingdom, have expressed discomfort with the plan after sending their ambassadors to check out the situation first hand. So far, there is no indication that Canada’s ambassador to Israel has paid any attention to this issue.

A month ago, Israel withdrew its proposal from consideration by the Knesset. However, the Israeli Prime Minister’s office has said the plan is still under review.

More information is available from the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, (ACRI) which is Israel’s oldest and largest civil rights organization. Www.acri.il

4. Should Canadians be embarrassed about having our name associated with Israel’s “Canada Park”, built atop 3 destroyed Palestinian villages? Ayalon Canada Park is a 2,000 acre recreation area situated on the highway between Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Its forested area serves as a picnic area for Israeli families to relax on most weekends. The park was created on the ruins of 3 Palestinian villages which were destroyed during the ’67 war (also known as the 6 day war). The 3 villages (Imwas, Beit Nuba and Yalo), were attacked and then bulldozed by the Israeli Defense Forces, driving out nearly 10,000 unarmed and unprotected Palestinians civilians who became refugees. Today this would be known as “ethnic cleansing”.

The land was subsequently confiscated without compensation and given to the Jewish National Fund.

Using money donated by the Jewish National Fund (Canada), trees were planted over the hills and valleys, almost completely obscuring the fact that there ever were Arab villages in the area. In recognition of Canada’s contribution, the park was named “Canada Park”, and the names of many Canadian donors appear on a large monument in the park.

A powerful video on Canada was made by the CBC’s “Fifth Estate” in 1991.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcZL-z9fdLA

Many Canadians have asked that Canada’s name be dissociated from this embarrassing episode. So far, our name still appears on the entrance to the park.

For more information, contact Dr. Ismael Zayid, of Halifax, Nova Scotia. Dr. Zayid is a Canadian citizen who was born in, and expelled from, what is now Canada Park. His website is: http://izayid.tripod.com

5. Should Canadians be concerned about freedom of the press in Israel – and the reliability of the information we receive in Canada on Israel/Palestine issues? Mr. Harper often refers to Israel as a “bulwark of democracy” in the Middle East. One of the cornerstones of democracy is undoubtedly press freedom – the freedom of the press to put the actions of powerful people, including the government, under scrutiny. However, Israel now stands in 112^th position on “freedom of the press” according to Reporters without Borders  (RSF) http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2013,1054.html

In certain respects, Press Freedom in Israel is similar to Canada’s. Papers like Ha’aretz can be very critical of the government. But in other respects, less so. During the attack on Gaza in 2012, the RSF reported that “IDF deliberately targeted journalists and buildings housing media that are affiliated to Hamas or support it. And the arbitrary arrest and detention of Palestinian journalists is still commonplace. ”

In addition, Israel has an official “military censor” who has the authority to review and limit any press or media article. Furthermore, other reports indicate that “self-censorship” is an even bigger issue in Israel. For example there are no Israeli journalists in Gaza.

Reference: For more information on Israeli censorship and self censorship see:

http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=11184

Or contact Jaffa based Independent Israeli journalist Lia Tarachansky (Lia.Tarachansky@gmail.com)

6. How can Canada help the current peace process? Canada has indicated that it would like to assist in the current “peace process”. Fairness, as well as practicality, would seem to require a minimal understanding of the issues and the realities on the ground, including in those Palestinian territories which are under Israeli occupation.

While Mr. Harper may not have time for such visits, here are some suggestions for the reporters who are travelling with him, either during this trip or on another occasion. Their reports would be useful to inform Canadians about the various aspects of the conflict:

1. Visit Gaza. The United Nations has said that there is a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, based on water, sewage, lack of housing. Israeli sources say that there is no such crisis. A visit could easily be arranged through the offices of UNRWA.
2. Visit Hebron or some Palestinian cities in the West Bank outside of Ramallah. Hebron is a city where a small number of Jewish settlers protected by the IDF have taken over the centre of the town. Tensions with local residents are very high. A tour of Hebron could be organized by: The Hebron Rehabilitation Committee. Contact: Walid Abu_Alhalaweh walid_halaweh@hotmail.com, Public Relations Director, cell: 972-0599-801118
3. Visit a Palestinian refugee camp. There are approximately 5 million Palestinian refugees, who have been expelled from Israel and denied the right to return. They are in Lebanon, Jordan and Syria, Gaza and the West Bank. There are several refugee camps in Bethlehem that are very easy to visit.
4. Visit Bethlehem University, a Catholic institution operated under the patronage of the Vatican. At BU the mostly female Palestinian students – both Muslim and Christian study together. (Unfortunately, Israeli law does not allow Jewish Israelis to study there however.

7. Does  Israel really share the basic Canadian value of equality of its citizens? No value runs deeper in the Canadian ethic than that the law treats all citizens equally. However, this is not the case in Israel. According to official Israeli statistics, Israel’s Jewish citizens have better housing, better jobs, better education, better health outcomes than its (non-Jewish) Arab Israeli citizens. Of course Canada, too, has citizens with a disadvantaged profile. (e.g. first nations)  But in Israel, discrimination against non-Jews is widespread in practice and permitted by law. For example, Jewish municipalities can pass regulations excluding Arabs from living there, and this is tolerated by the Supreme Court. Indeed, the very notion of municipalities segregated along ethnic or religious lines is antithetical to Canadian values.

Increasingly right wing Israeli governments have recently enacted legislation which excludes, ignores, and discriminates against the Palestinian Arab minority. Since the establishment of the state, Israel has relied upon these laws to ground their discriminatory treatment of Arab citizens and allow the unequal status and unequal treatment of Jewish and Arab citizens to persist.

For further information, Haifa based ADALAH, (The Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel) has documented both the inequalities facing Israeli Arabs and the legal structure that supports it. Of particular interest are two ADALAH reports.

One lists a series of 29 new or impending discriminatory laws that have been presented to the Knesset in the last few years.

http://adalah.org/Public/files/Discriminatory-Laws-Database/Discriminatory-Bills-19th-Knesset-24-06-2013.pdf

Another, “The Inequality Report”, documents the economic inequality facing Palestinian Israelis and describes the legal structure which ensures it. http://adalah.org/upfiles/2011/Adalah_The_Inequality_Report_March_2011.pdf

8. Should Canada re-examine the role of the Jewish National Fund (JNF) with an eye to reconsider its tax exempt status in Canada? JNF Canada (the organization which honoured Mr. Harper at its “Negev Dinner” in Toronto last month) has “charitable” status in Canada and receives millions of dollars in tax deductible donations every year. It promotes itself as an environmental organization, and undoubtedly does some valuable land reclamation projects. However, critics in Canada (including Jewish critics) have noted that the JNF is inherently discriminatory – its statutes mandate it to hold land for “Jewish use” and it is forbidden to sell its land to Israeli Arabs. Furthermore, some of the projects it finances (like the Canada Park project mentioned above) have as their objective to eradicate signs of Palestinian life both inside Israel and in the Occupied Territories.

Given that non-discrimination and equality are Canadian values, it seems hard to justify giving JNF Canada tax deductible status.

For more information on the JNF, contact Independent Jewish Voices Canada (IJV). www.ijvcanada.ca

9. Should Canada encourage Israel to join the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty and submit to UN inspection of its nuclear weapons program? According to Janes Defence Weekly, a British publication, Israel has between 100 and 300 nuclear warheads, making it the world’s 6th nuclear power. It also says Israel has long and medium range Jericho rockets. Israel has had an undeclared nuclear weapons program since the mid ‘60’s. It has consistently refused to enter UN-sponsored negotiations towards establishing a nuclear-weapons-free zone in the Middle East, even though, ironically, Iran has done so. Canada has a long history of supporting Nuclear Non Proliferation. Would it not be a good time to suggest to Mr. Netanyahu that Israel join the treaty?

The post NCCAR suggests background issues for journalists concerning Canada’s relation to Israel/Palestine appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

“Canada recognizes the importance of building inclusive and stable societies, underpinned by democracy, freedom, human rights and the rule of law,” Harper told a crowd at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre in December when he announced that he would be travelling to Israel.

In this regard, Canadians should know the answers to 6 key issues relating to Canada, and the Israel/Palestine issue.

1. Is it still Canada’s official policy that the occupation of East Jerusalem and the West Bank is illegal? If so, what are we doing to support that policy? In March 2010, former minister Lawrence Cannon said that Israeli expansion into East Jerusalem “is contrary to international law and (we) therefore condemn it. We are very concerned about what is taking place.” Yet barely a year later Hon. John Baird held an unprecedented meeting with an Israeli official in occupied East Jerusalem. This would seem to indicate a change in the Canadian position, and to presage Canadian approval of the annexation of East Jerusalem by Israel.
   –
2. How does Canada view the continued expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank? Does Canada agree that this is an obstacle to peace? Since the signing of the Oslo accords, over 400,000 additional Israeli settlers have moved into the West Bank (including East Jerusalem), bringing the total to over 650,000. There is now an almost continuous circle of Israeli settlements around Jerusalem and also over 100 more settlements scattered across the West Bank. Most observers feel that ongoing settlement construction is a major obstacle to an eventual peace agreement. What is Canada’s opinion on the newest batch of settlements announced by Prime Minister Netanyahu? Will Canada ask Israel to stop settlement construction as the UK and the US have done?
   –
3. Will Canada join Britain, France and other countries that have called for goods from the Israeli settlements in the West Bank to be labelled as such? The United Church of Canada, our largest Protestant church, has called for a boycott of all goods exported from Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Many EU countries, including the UK and France are demanding that settlement products be labelled, as they do not qualify for trade benefits. Yet the Canada-Israel Free Trade Agreement extends benefits to goods coming from the settlements. Thus at the same time Canada says that the occupation is illegal while supporting trade in goods from the settlements.
   –
4. Given the resonance in Canada to the late Nelson Mandela’s successful campaign to end apartheid in South Africa, what does the Prime Minister feel about the apartheid-style developments in the West Bank? Many observers, from Bishop Desmond Tutu, to former President Jimmy Carter, have warned about the apartheid-like features of Israeli rule in the West Bank. Mandela himself stated “We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.” Former NYTimes Jerusalem Bureau Chief Clyde Haberman has referred to the “suffocating blanket of permanent restrictions” on Palestinians in the West Bank. A short drive around Jerusalem to the other side of the wall will reveal the network of controlled access roads, checkpoints, barricades and other evidence of the separation of Palestinians from the Israeli settlers in their midst.
   –
5. Given the Prime Minister’s well known concern for the protection of children, what is his attitude to the recent UNICEF report detailing widespread and extensive abuse of Palestinian children by Israeli military forces? Last March, UNICEF released a briefing paper titled “Children in Israeli military detention” which was severely critical of the treatment of Palestinian children in Israeli military custody. The report said that 7,000 minors, some as young as 9, had been detained between 2002 and 2012. The paper stated that there appeared to be a pattern of ill-treatment during the arrest, transfer and interrogation of child detainees in the West Bank.
   –
6. Given Canada’s commitment to religious freedom, will the Prime Minister express Canada’s concerns about the difficulties imposed by Israel on Christian and Muslim Palestinians who wish to practice their faith? Palestinian Christians who live on the other side of the “separation barrier” must get a permit from Israeli security before visiting Jerusalem including the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Similarly, Palestinian Muslims from either side of the barrier are regularly denied the right to visit the Al Aqsa Mosque, one of the holiest sites for Muslims.

For media requests, please contact Peter Larson, Chair of the National Education Committee on Israel/Palestine (NECIP) with the National Council on Canada Arab Relations: 613-238-3795

The post NCCAR suggests 6 questions to ask PM Harper during his visit to Israel/Palestine appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.

A group of 45 human rights activists in Ottawa attended an educational event about the Palestinian refugees on Oct 3, 2013. One of the participants said in their feedback form: “I learned more than expected!”. The very successful meeting was organized by the National Education committee on Israel Palestine (NECIP) which works under the National Council on Canada-Arab Relations (NCCAR).

Peter Larson,  NCCAR Board member and chairperson of NECIP, said in introductory remarks that the group decided to organize this event because: “The issue of the Palestinian refugees is arguably:

o The most important issue for the Palestinians
o The most emotional issue, and, paradoxically,
o The one that gets the least attention.”

Peter Larson

The program included a recorded video presentation by Dr. Salman Abu Sitta, a Palestinian researcher, which provided historical background about the issue. After that, three members of the Palestinian-Canadian community in Ottawa shared the personal stories of their families.

If you would like to read more about Palestinian refugees, please see information and references below.

———————-

Mayssam speaking about Palestinian refugee families in Lebanon

———————————–

Palestinian Refugees: A Few Facts to Remember

700,000 Palestinian refugees were forced to leave their homes in 1948 by Zionist military militias to create a “Jewish State” – Israel.

5,000,000 Palestinian refugees live now in different countries, including 1.5 million who live in 58 camps in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, West Bank and Gaza.

194 is the number of the UN General Assembly resolution that states “ the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date.”

13 is the number of the Article in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that says: “Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.”

UNWRA – The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees responds to the basic needs of the Palestinian refugees in camps. It provides education, health care, relief and social services, camp infrastructure.

Palestinian Refugees: References

Web:

United Nations Relief and Works Agency: http://www.unrwa.org/

Zochrot – Israeli NGO: http://zochrot.org/en

Dr. Salman Abu Sitta, Right of Return Conference, University of Boston, Apr 6-7, 2013:   http://www.plands.org/videos/010.html

BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights:http://www.badil.org/en/publications

Andrei Marmor, “Entitlement to Land and The Right of Return: An Embarrassing Challenge for Liberal Zionism,” USC Public Policy Research Paper No. 03-17.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=424622

Mazin Qumsiyeh, PhD, “Palestinian Refugees Right to Return and Repatriation”
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/history/ref-qumsiyeh.html

Daniel Haboucha, “Danny Ayalon and the Jewish refugee fallacy”, Oct 1, 2012
http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/danny-ayalon-and-the-jewish-refugee-fallacy/

Books & Articles:

Dr. Ilan Pappe, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Oneworld Publications; Reprint edition (September 7, 2007)

Dr. Lex Takkenberg, The Status of Palestinian Refugees in International Law, Oxford University Press, USA (June 25, 1998)

Mallison, W. T., & Mallison, S. V. (1980). The right of return. Journal of Palestine Studies, 9(3), 125-136.

John Quigley, “Displaced Palestinians and the Right of Return,” Harvard International Law Journal 39 (1998): 193-98.

The post Successful event about Palestinian refugees in Ottawa appeared first on National Council on Canada-Arab Relations.